It costs between 1 1/2 and 2 rubles, or around 2 cents, to buy a like or a repost on Facebook. That’s also the going rate for retweets when Leonid Slutsky’s posts need a little nudging on Twitter.
Slutsky is the head of the foreign affairs committee in the lower house of the Russian parliament, the State Duma. He often writes about such topics as “provocation from Brussels” or the “hellish absurdity” of the Biden administration on his social media accounts.
And as DW has discovered, he uses the Russian promotional site, bosslike.ru, to buy likes. The site also charges for reposts, views and to inflate subscriber numbers on all the main social media outlets, including Telegram, YouTube and TikTok, and the popular Russian networks, Odnoklassniki or VKontakte.
The platform gives approximate rates for the purchase of various types of activities on specific social networks. But in the end, everyone decides what they’re willing to pay to have their posts promoted. The more they pay, the faster it all works. Theoretically, anyone using the site can buy likes or retweets for Slutsky, or any other post or account — all that’s needed is a current email address.
All of Slutsky’s posts were listed on bosslike.ru when DW began observing the site in mid-March. Within a half hour of appearing online, one of Slutsky’s Facebook posts about the situation on the Russian-Ukrainian border also appeared on the site to be promoted. DW asked Slutsky in writing if he or any of his staff were paying for likes or reposts, but so far there hasn’t been a reply.
The popularity of many of Leonid Slutsky’s social media posts appears to have been given a boost
Slutsky came to the attention of the wider Russian public in 2018 for allegedly sexually harassing several female journalists. But despite the public furor, he was cleared by the State Duma’s ethics committee.
The Dossier Center, a nonprofit organization run by the self-exiled Russian businessman Mikhail Khodorkovsky, is an organization which, in its own words, “tracks the criminal activity of various people associated with the Kremlin.”
In an analysis published in early April, it said that the so-called Russian Peace Federation, a group headed by Slutsky, was asking US senators in Washington for grant money. At the same time, Slutsky’s social media accounts were ruthlessly criticizing the United States and the European Union.
In a recent Twitter post, Slutsky said “it is not Russia that is pulling away from the EU but rather Brussels that is provoking confrontations.” To date, he has received at least 170 likes for this tweet. DW looked into the 78 public accounts that liked the tweet and found that all but one came for the same Russian promotion site. The profiles were also filled with retweets of other posts listed on the promotion site, and at least nine accounts have since been flagged and suspended by Twitter due to suspicious activity.
NATO’s Strategic Communications Centre of Excellence (NATO StratCom COE) has been looking into the issue of buying social media popularity since 2018. Rolf Fredheim, a researcher with the center, said that several accounts belonging to lesser-known local Russian politicians can be found on such promotional sites. He told DW that other prominent lawmakers in the State Duma are also on the list, but he was reluctant to single out any particular politician.
However, Fredheim pointed out that politicians remain relatively rare on such platforms. “Most often, it’s the so-called influencers who resort to buying likes, who want to become known on Instagram or Facebook,” he said, estimating that politicians make up only around 10% of the clients. “Often, it’s also startups and businesses that want to appear to be bigger and more popular than they actually are.”
On one of the promotional sites, DW uncovered a VKontakte profile belonging to Konstantin Malofeev, the Russian media czar and a confidant of President Vladimir Putin. In his posts, Malofeev —a supporter of Russian separatists in eastern Ukraine — lashes out against “the Kyiv junta” or the “godless EU” on a regular basis.
Another figure on the promotional site is Oleksandr Feldman, a current member of the Ukrainian parliament and a former ally of ex-president Viktor Yanukovych, who fled to Russia in 2014. Feldman is now on the campaign trail and hopes to become the mayor of Kharkiv, Ukraine’s second-largest city in. Social media likes on his posts are going for more than a cent apiece.
According to the NATO StratCom COE, Russian companies dominate the market when it comes to manipulating social media networks. In a report published in late 2020, the organization said that nearly all of the big software and infrastructure providers they had identified were of Russian origin.
It said that between 10% and 30% of all likes, reposts and views on these platforms could be attributed to fake social media activities. “But we have only been able to take snapshots of the current data, which makes accessing the full extent of the manipulation impossible,” said the center’s director, Janis Sarts.
Recent posts by media czar Konstantin Malofeev were listed on bosslike.ru
In principle, manipulation is possible on almost all platforms, said Sarts. Twitter and Facebook are still considered the safest social networks; manipulation is particularly popular on these sites, so they do the most to prevent it.
“YouTube and Instagram, on the other hand, are not very well protected. In our estimation, however, TikTok is the most insecure of the five platforms we examined,” Sarts told DW.
Paying for likes and subscribers doesn’t violate any current laws, but Fredheim believes that the European regulating agencies responsible for such matters should prohibit such exchanges within the EU.
Sarts also thinks that big internet companies need to do a better job at combating bots and social media manipulation, and thinks networks that don’t give users the ability to determine whether they are interacting with a bot or a real person should face heavy fines.
“Social media networks have become a place for public debate. And when manipulation is possible in such a place, this undermines the democratic process,” he said.
The key to fighting these exchanges is to make them so expensive as to no longer be worthwhile, but Fredheim said it’s going to be a long time before we get to that point.
“Facebook and Twitter have done a lot over the last few years and manipulation is a lot more difficult than it was in the past. But overall, it’s still relatively easy — and pretty cheap.”
This article has been adapted from Russian
After a winter of uncommonly heavy rains, spring broke in southern California to the sight of sprawling blooms of wildflowers. Too good a backdrop to miss, some 50,000 people flocked to the area in search of the perfect shot. Where the delicate poppies were trampled, picked and crushed by reclining posers, they won’t grow back. It doesn’t take much to destroy places of natural beauty.
What used to be a local family hangout overlooking the Colorado River near the Grand Canyon has become one of the most instagrammed places in the US. Horsehoe Bend has gone from attracting a few thousand to a couple of million visitors annually. Car parks are being expanded to accommodate the throngs who clog up trails and cause traffic congestion in a remote place.
Soon after local photographer Johannes Holzer posted a photo of the Bavarian lake near where he grew up, Instagrammers descended. In an interview with German broadcaster Bayrischer Rundfunk, he said the path down to the lake now looks like it has been trampled by soldiers. It is also littered with trash and cigarette butts and is no longer a place of solitude. His take-away? No more geo-tagging.
When a tiny Austrian village of just 700 inhabitants was hyped as a perfect Instagram backdrop, an average of 80 tourist buses and 10,000 visitors started pouring in every day. Locals complain that tourists walk into their properties to find the best possible angle for their photographs, leave trash behind, film with drones that scare off birds, and generally destroy the peace and quiet.
Playa Jardín on the Spanish island of Tenerife is a popular spot among photographers who build little towers with stones collected from the beach nearby. Their designs might make for good shots, but because the spiders, insects and lizards that live under the stones lose their shelter when they’re removed from the beach, the towers actually damage the local ecosystem.
What’s more, plant organisms essential to the health of the ground are uprooted when the position of the stones is changed. That led environmentalists to dismantle the rock formations earlier this year, posting explanations on Instagram under the hashtag #pasasinhuella, meaning “leave no trace.” Just a few days after the campaign, Instagrammers had already started rebuilding the stone towers.
Named for its dead algae that resembles a popular snack, “Popcorn Beach” on the Canary Island of Fuerteventura has gained traction among the Instagram set. But so many people have started taking the algae home as memorabilia that an estimated 10 kilos is disappearing every month. In response, The Clean Ocean Project has started sharing photos like this on Instagram.
With more than 10 million images on Instagram, Iceland has become a very popular destination for influencers. But to get the perfect shot, many drive off road, which damages the countryside. They sit on glaciers, walk on moss that can die if trampled, and fly drones over wild animals. The tourist board Visit Iceland has now launched several initiatives promoting responsible behavior by tourists.
The anonymous Instagram account Public Lands Hate You is part of a trend to shame irresponsible behavior. The account reposts images of people breaking the rules outdoors, which has prompted brands to break with some of the influencers and has even led to investigations from US national park services. But it has also garnered criticism for naming people without their consent.